VinFast’s newest electric vehicle (EV) factory was barely inaugurated before it ran into a wave of street-level resistance. As the Vietnamese automaker presses ahead with its ambitious global expansion, including a multi‑billion‑dollar manufacturing hub in Chatham County, North Carolina, local communities and environmental advocates are increasingly vocal about the project’s social and ecological costs. Demonstrations around the new plant underscore the growing tension between the promise of green industry and the realities of rapid industrial development on the ground.
VinFast, part of Vietnam’s Vingroup conglomerate, has billed its North Carolina facility as a cornerstone of its North American strategy. The company secured roughly $1.2 billion in state and local incentives for the project, the largest economic incentive package in North Carolina’s history, tied to a planned $2 billion first‑phase investment in a factory designed to produce up to 150,000 vehicles per year in Phase 1. Officials have touted the facility as a transformative employer, projecting up to 7,500 jobs once the project is fully realized.
Yet protests surrounding the plant highlight a different narrative: fears of polluted waterways, displacement of long‑standing communities and skepticism over whether the promised economic boom will materialize. Demonstrators say they are not opposed to EVs per se, but to what they describe as a rushed, opaque and environmentally risky development on a sprawling industrial site that covers roughly 1,300 to 2,000 acres of largely forested land near the Haw River and Cape Fear River basin.
Much of the anger around the plant centers on its environmental footprint. The factory site sits in a sensitive watershed that feeds into the Haw River, Jordan Lake and the Cape Fear River—water sources for communities from Pittsboro and parts of Wake County down to Sanford and Fayetteville.
According to filings with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the VinFast project as proposed would permanently impact about 3,700 feet of streams and roughly 23 acres of wetlands through dredging and filling activities. Earlier analyses cited 17 streams and 36 wetland areas—totaling about 99 acres—within the project footprint, including several rated as high‑quality habitat. Local river advocates warn that dredging and filling these areas could permanently erase key aquatic habitat at the base of the food chain, from macroinvertebrates to nursery grounds for small fish.
Field sampling by the Haw River Assembly in 2023 found turbidity levels—an indicator of sediment pollution—in nearby creeks far above state standards. In Shaddox Creek, turbidity exceeded 200 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), compared with a 50‑NTU legal limit for non‑trout streams in North Carolina. Advocates say that highly turbid, clay‑heavy runoff has repeatedly flowed off the construction site into tributaries that eventually feed the Haw River and Cape Fear River.
Facing criticism from demonstrators and environmental groups, VinFast argues that many of the environmental impacts are unavoidable for any major industrial project at the site—and that it has taken steps to minimize and offset harm.
In a statement to regional media, the company said that impacts to streams and wetlands within the property have been largely avoided by placing core manufacturing facilities on upland areas, with direct impacts limited mainly to perpendicular roadway crossings needed for safe access across the site. VinFast and the North Carolina Department of Transportation have also proposed purchasing mitigation credits from the state’s stream and wetland mitigation program, which fund restoration and conservation projects elsewhere in the watershed to offset local damage.
Company representatives and state officials frame the factory as part of a broader climate‑policy pivot toward electric vehicles. North Carolina has adopted goals to reduce greenhouse‑gas emissions and accelerate EV adoption, and VinFast’s plant—its first in the United States—is touted as a way to support that transition while reshoring advanced manufacturing jobs.
Protesters are not only focused on environmental risk; they are also questioning the economic assumptions underpinning the generous incentive package. Under North Carolina’s Transformative Job Development and Investment Grant (JDIG) program, VinFast could receive up to $316.1 million in state reimbursements over 30 years if it meets job and investment targets, on top of hundreds of millions in local subsidies. Critics note that JDIG’s track record is mixed, with several high‑profile firms failing to meet promises and later withdrawing.
Meanwhile, construction and production timelines have repeatedly slipped. VinFast first announced its North Carolina plant in March 2022 with an ambitious goal of opening by 2024. By 2023, the company acknowledged that the start of production would be delayed until at least 2025 amid what it called procedural permitting delays. Local outlets now report further uncertainty and pauses in construction as VinFast repeatedly revises building plans and square footage for its main assembly facility.
Financial questions loom as well. Since 2021, the company has reported multi‑billion‑dollar losses and relied heavily on its parent group and financial engineering—including a SPAC merger that valued the firm at roughly $23 billion in equity—to fund expansion. In 2023, filings showed that more than half of VinFast’s reported vehicle sales were to related parties, raising further questions about market demand.
For residents closest to the factory site, the controversy is also deeply personal. To build new highway access and utility corridors for the plant, state transportation officials have invoked eminent domain, affecting dozens of homes and small businesses.
Among the most symbolic losses cited by protesters is the recent demolition of Merry Oaks Baptist Church, a congregation founded in 1888 that long stood at the crossroads near the planned factory access road. Reporting from local media describes how the church, three businesses and at least eleven homes were targeted for relocation or demolition to clear the way for Phase 1 road projects linked to the plant. Opponents say such losses are too high a price to pay for a project whose long‑term viability they doubt.
The protests around VinFast’s new plant are about more than one company. They crystallize a broader dilemma facing communities worldwide: how to reconcile urgent climate goals and the rapid build‑out of low‑carbon industries with the protection of local ecosystems, cultural heritage and public finances.
On paper, electric vehicles are a central pillar of decarbonization strategies, and large‑scale EV manufacturing could help reduce global emissions if it succeeds in displacing gasoline and diesel cars. But as the demonstrators outside VinFast’s new factory argue, the label “green” does not erase the on‑the‑ground impacts of industrial development—or the need for stronger safeguards, transparency and accountability when public money and public resources are at stake.
For VinFast, the challenge now is to prove that its promises—to create thousands of jobs, respect local waterways, and build a lasting presence in the U.S. market—can withstand the scrutiny that comes when a “factory of the future” is greeted, from day one, with protest signs at its gates.
You've reached the juicy part of the story.
Sign in with Google to unlock the rest — it takes 2 seconds, and we promise no spoilers in your inbox.
Free forever. No credit card. Just great reading.